Monday, February 24, 2020

Managing change and innovation Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Managing change and innovation - Research Paper Example Innovation is a new way of doing something. Innovation could be a result of incremental or evolutionary process or it could be result of some radical or revolutionary process. Change and innovation are closely related to each other and most of the times are coupled with each other during usage. Dubai has become a center of attraction for many reasons like businesses, tourism, shopping, luxurious hotels etc. There are many unique things about Dubai that are available very rarely in other parts of the worlds at one place. With so much going on in the city, the basic facilities provided by the Government of Dubai need to be matching with the other factors as well. Amongst the basic facilities that are government’s responsibility, health is probably the most important factor to take care of. Dubai has state-of-the-art facilities in health fields which are very fitting if compared with the advancements made in other fields. Different hospitals working under the Department of Health and Medical Services (DOHMS) like Al-Wasl hospital, Dubai Hospital, Rashid hospital etc. not only have very nice facilities available but they are also working to keep up with the pace of research and development in the field of medicine. New researches are applied to make sure the cure and prevention methods are applied to maximum use. Dubai is part of oil-rich country United Arab Emirates. Oil-richness is a good enough feature for the rest of the world to be renowned for but in a matter of few decades, Dubai has transformed itself. Now it has earned a distinction of a city which is a home to great international businesses and a tourism favorite. Dubai is a dynamic city with ever-growing net of tall buildings and facilities that attract many businesses towards it. Dubai is a modern cosmopolitan city and it has a mixture of multiple ethnicities that live in a very well-coordinated manner. Dubai is considered to

Saturday, February 8, 2020

Discuss the rationale and impact of the decision on company law Assignment

Discuss the rationale and impact of the decision on company law - Assignment Example The conflict between the personal opinion of judges and the legal provisions of the law has been in existence for years, and this conflict has resulted in the determination of cases in a manner that does not reflect the legal provisions. However, under the case Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22, the supremacy of the law as the principle that guides courts in determining cases was cemented. This is because; in both the High Court and the courts of appeal, the judges held that the merit of the case Broderip v. Salomon [1985] 2 simply warranted the consideration of Salomon Ltd as an ‘alias’, thus allowing for the treatment of Salomon Ltd and Mr. Aron Salomon as one and the same thing (Rickett, 1998:16). Therefore, the High Court and the Court of Appeal ruled that Mr. Aron Salomon was responsible for paying the debts incurred by Salomon Ltd. However, the House of Lords unanimously overturned the ruling, by holding that the opinions and personal perspectives of the judges were subordinate to the provisions of the law, and the provisions of the law under Companies Act (1862) had provided that a company could be incorporated for as long as it had seven members, regardless of whether the members contributed to the company in any substantial way or whether they were just mere individuals enlisted as part of the company ownership (Sealy, 2010:36). Thus, the relevance of the case Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] AC 22 in company law is that it cemented the position of law as the principle reference for which the courts should base their judgments, while placing the opinion and fair judgment of the juries subordinate to the principle of the law. This is considering the fact that judge Vaughan Williams J. of the High Court had applied his opinion in ruling the case Broderip v. Salomon [1985] 2, whereby he opined that as opposed to the application of the legal provisions of Companies Act 1862 in the case, it was a bit more